↓ Skip to main content

Remote sensing for cost-effective blue carbon accounting

Overview of attention for article published in Earth-Science Reviews, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
84 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Remote sensing for cost-effective blue carbon accounting
Published in
Earth-Science Reviews, March 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104337
Authors

Martino E. Malerba, Micheli Duarte de Paula Costa, Daniel A. Friess, Lukas Schuster, Mary A. Young, David Lagomasino, Oscar Serrano, Sharyn M. Hickey, Paul H. York, Michael Rasheed, Jonathan S. Lefcheck, Ben Radford, Trisha B. Atwood, Daniel Ierodiaconou, Peter Macreadie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Unspecified 11 9%
Student > Master 9 7%
Lecturer 5 4%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 53 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 20 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 13%
Unspecified 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 61 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#595,622
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Earth-Science Reviews
#87
of 1,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,430
of 425,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth-Science Reviews
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.