↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Changes in Retinal Sensitivity Associated With Cotoretigene Toliparvovec in X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa With RPGR Gene Variations
Published in
JAMA Ophthalmology, March 2023
DOI 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.6254
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lenore von Krusenstiern, Jiajun Liu, Eileen Liao, James A. Gow, Guo Chen, Tuyen Ong, Andrew J. Lotery, Assad Jalil, Byron L. Lam, Robert E. MacLaren, Imran H. Yusuf, Jasmina Cehajic-Kapetanovic, Amandeep S. Josan, Cristina Martinez-Fernandez de la Camera, Salwah Rehman, Laura J. Wood, Jasleen K. Jolly, Kanmin Xue, Anika Nanda, Kirti Jasani, Moreno Menghini, Thomas M.W. Buckley, Anna Paola Salvetti, Suresh Thulasidharan, Miguel Kurc, Samir Khandhadia, Karla Orsine Murta Dias, Abeir Baltmr, Nakul Mandal, Georgios Tsokolas, Paulo Stanga, Tsveta Ivanova, Muhannd EL-Faouri, Sherif Shaarawy, Graeme Black, Janet Louise Davis, Ninel Gregori, Carlos E. Mendoza-Santiesteban, Potyra R. Rosa, Kevin G. Evans, Rob Koenekoop, Dominik Fischer, Frank Holz, Kamron Khan, Jason Horowitz, Mark Pennesi, David Birch, Michael Gorin, Kim Stepien, Jacque Duncan, Tim Stout, Benjamin Bakall, Paul S. Bernstein, Eeva-Maria Sankila, Carel Hoyng, Camiel Boon, Isabelle Meunier

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Student > Master 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 21 66%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 20 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,419,475
of 28,036,136 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#1,058
of 4,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,553
of 441,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#26
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,036,136 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.