You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transformation of Nicotiana paniculata L., a recalcitrant species, using a T-DNA construct carrying two WUSCHEL-related homeobox genes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Biotechnology, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.22.1124a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masaharu Kyo, Momoko Hagiya, Madoka Tada, Akemi Matsura |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#15,499,230
of 25,349,035 outputs
Outputs from Plant Biotechnology
#162
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,702
of 412,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Biotechnology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,349,035 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.