You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Automated Contouring and Planning in Radiation Therapy: What Is ‘Clinically Acceptable’?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diagnostics, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3390/diagnostics13040667 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hana Baroudi, Kristy K. Brock, Wenhua Cao, Xinru Chen, Caroline Chung, Laurence E. Court, Mohammad D. El Basha, Maguy Farhat, Skylar Gay, Mary P. Gronberg, Aashish Chandra Gupta, Soleil Hernandez, Kai Huang, David A. Jaffray, Rebecca Lim, Barbara Marquez, Kelly Nealon, Tucker J. Netherton, Callistus M. Nguyen, Brandon Reber, Dong Joo Rhee, Ramon M. Salazar, Mihir D. Shanker, Carlos Sjogreen, McKell Woodland, Jinzhong Yang, Cenji Yu, Yao Zhao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 70% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 19 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,517,949
of 23,868,920 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostics
#132
of 5,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,110
of 435,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostics
#8
of 405 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,920 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 405 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.