You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Airborne Transmission: Science Rejected, Lives Lost. Can Society Do Better?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.1093/cid/ciad068 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lidia Morawska, William Bahnfleth, Philomena M Bluyssen, Atze Boerstra, Giorgio Buonanno, Stephanie J Dancer, Andres Floto, Francesco Franchimon, Charles Haworth, Jaap Hogeling, Christina Isaxon, Jose L Jimenez, Jarek Kurnitski, Yuguo Li, Marcel Loomans, Guy Marks, Linsey C Marr, Livio Mazzarella, Arsen Krikor Melikov, Shelly Miller, Donald K Milton, William Nazaroff, Peter V Nielsen, Catherine Noakes, Jordan Peccia, Xavier Querol, Chandra Sekhar, Olli Seppänen, Shin-ichi Tanabe, Raymond Tellier, Tham Kwok Wai, Pawel Wargocki, Aneta Wierzbicka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,331 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 297 | 13% |
Canada | 242 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 127 | 5% |
Australia | 73 | 3% |
Germany | 28 | 1% |
France | 26 | 1% |
Spain | 20 | <1% |
Italy | 19 | <1% |
Japan | 16 | <1% |
Other | 205 | 9% |
Unknown | 1278 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1952 | 84% |
Scientists | 198 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 127 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 49 | 2% |
Unknown | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 14% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 19% |
Unknown | 15 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1342. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#9,836
of 25,840,929 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#47
of 16,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299
of 485,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#1
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,840,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.