↓ Skip to main content

Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Airborne Transmission: Science Rejected, Lives Lost. Can Society Do Better?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
1321 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
11 Redditors
bluesky
23 Bluesky users
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Airborne Transmission: Science Rejected, Lives Lost. Can Society Do Better?
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, February 2023
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciad068
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,321 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 7 10%
Researcher 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Student > Master 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 39 57%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 40 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 942. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2026.
All research outputs
#22,527
of 34,452,566 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#68
of 21,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#615
of 534,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#1
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,452,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.