You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against infections, hospitalisations, and mortality in adults: findings from a rapid living systematic evidence synthesis and meta-analysis up to December, 2022
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2213-2600(23)00015-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nana Wu, Keven Joyal-Desmarais, Paula A B Ribeiro, Ariany Marques Vieira, Jovana Stojanovic, Comfort Sanuade, Doro Yip, Simon L Bacon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 990 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 181 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 39 | 4% |
| Canada | 35 | 4% |
| Australia | 17 | 2% |
| Germany | 13 | 1% |
| Spain | 12 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 11 | 1% |
| France | 8 | <1% |
| Japan | 8 | <1% |
| Other | 91 | 9% |
| Unknown | 575 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 859 | 87% |
| Scientists | 68 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 44 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 63 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1002. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,421
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#40
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#501
of 484,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#1
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 79.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.