↓ Skip to main content

Solidification of basaltic magma during flow in a dike

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Science, June 1982
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Solidification of basaltic magma during flow in a dike
Published in
American Journal of Science, June 1982
DOI 10.2475/ajs.282.6.856
Authors

P. T. Delaney, D. D. Pollard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Researcher 11 19%
Professor 6 10%
Other 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 45 78%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Science
#144
of 820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,984
of 7,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them