| Title |
Population-based evaluation of the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir–ritonavir for reducing hospital admissions and mortality from COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.221608 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin L. Schwartz, Jun Wang, Mina Tadrous, Bradley J. Langford, Nick Daneman, Valerie Leung, Tara Gomes, Lindsay Friedman, Peter Daley, Kevin A. Brown |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 167 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 39 | 23% |
| United States | 14 | 8% |
| Japan | 12 | 7% |
| Solomon Islands | 1 | <1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 91 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 131 | 78% |
| Scientists | 22 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 374. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#85,592
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#152
of 9,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,263
of 489,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#3
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 489,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.