You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dispersal Limitation Does Not Control High Elevational Distribution of Alien Plant Species in the Southern Sierra Nevada, California
|
---|---|
Published in |
Natural Areas Journal, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.3375/043.036.0308 |
Authors |
Philip W. Rundel, Jon E. Keeley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 24% |
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 12 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 32% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Natural Areas Journal
#71
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,155
of 351,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Areas Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them