↓ Skip to main content

リオデジャネイロ2016 オリンピック日本代表および候補選手のサプリメント使用状況

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Performance Sport, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
リオデジャネイロ2016 オリンピック日本代表および候補選手のサプリメント使用状況
Published in
Journal of High Performance Sport, October 2020
DOI 10.32155/jissjhps.6.0_62
Authors

吉野 昌恵, 井上 なぎさ, 吉﨑 貴大, 石橋 彩, 近藤 衣美, 元永 恵子, 上東 悦子, 蒲原 一之, 亀井 明子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,370,537
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Performance Sport
#2
of 11 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,814
of 438,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Performance Sport
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them