You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-Resolution Seismic Reflection Imaging of Growth Folding and Shallow Faults beneath the Southern Puget Lowland, Washington StateHigh-Resolution Seismic Reflection Imaging of Folding and Shallow Faults beneath the Puget Lowland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1785/0120080306 |
| Authors |
Curtis R. Clement, Thomas L. Pratt, Mark L. Holmes, Brian L. Sherrod |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 46% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 77% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
#802
of 2,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,934
of 103,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.