You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mortality patterns and detection bias from carcass data: An example from wolf recovery in Wisconsin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.922 |
| Authors |
Jennifer L. Stenglein, Timothy R. Van Deelen, Adrian P. Wydeven, David J. Mladenoff, Jane E. Wiedenhoeft, Nancy K. Businga, Julia A. Langenberg, Nancy J. Thomas, Dennis M. Heisey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 20% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,402,370
of 25,104,329 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#957
of 2,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,631
of 269,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,104,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.