You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
APPARENT FIELD SAFETY OF A RACCOON POXVIRUS-VECTORED PLAGUE VACCINE IN FREE-RANGING PRAIRIE DOGS (CYNOMYS SPP.), COLORADO, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.7589/2014-02-051 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel W. Tripp, Tonie E. Rocke, Sean P. Streich, Rachel C. Abbott, Jorge E. Osorio, Michael W. Miller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 12 | 10% |
| United States | 9 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Morocco | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 79 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 114 | 96% |
| Scientists | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 29% |
| Other | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 37% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 14 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#588,717
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#16
of 1,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,261
of 363,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#2
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.