You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proposed best modeling practices for assessing the effects of ecosystem restoration on fish
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Modelling, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.12.020 |
| Authors |
Kenneth A. Rose, Shaye Sable, Donald L. DeAngelis, Simeon Yurek, Joel C. Trexler, William Graf, Denise J. Reed |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 27% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Modelling
#773
of 2,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,784
of 270,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Modelling
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,342 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.