↓ Skip to main content

Selection of forest canopy gaps by male Cerulean Warblers in West Virginia

Overview of attention for article published in Wilson Bulletin, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selection of forest canopy gaps by male Cerulean Warblers in West Virginia
Published in
Wilson Bulletin, June 2014
DOI 10.1676/13-067.1
Authors

Kelly A. Perkins, Petra Bohall Wood

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 44%
Environmental Science 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Wilson Bulletin
#460
of 1,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,389
of 240,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wilson Bulletin
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.