You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Analysis of Regional Scale Risk of Whirling Disease in Populations of Colorado and Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout Using a Bayesian Belief Network Model
|
---|---|
Published in |
Risk Analysis: An International Journal, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1111/risa.12189 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kimberley Kolb Ayre, Colleen A. Caldwell, Jonah Stinson, Wayne G. Landis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ukraine | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 79 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 13 | 16% |
Researcher | 13 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 23 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 26% |
Environmental Science | 21 | 26% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 25 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Risk Analysis: An International Journal
#1,261
of 2,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,094
of 240,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Analysis: An International Journal
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.