↓ Skip to main content

Breeding site heterogeneity reduces variability in frog recruitment and population dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Breeding site heterogeneity reduces variability in frog recruitment and population dynamics
Published in
Biological Conservation, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.013
Authors

Rebecca M. McCaffery, Lisa A. Eby, Bryce A. Maxell, Paul Stephen Corn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 71 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 59%
Environmental Science 17 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,156,614
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,954
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,856
of 322,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#47
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.