You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A sampling design and model for estimating abundance of Nile crocodiles while accounting for heterogeneity of detectability of multiple observers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.348 |
| Authors |
Matthew H. Shirley, Robert M. Dorazio, Ekramy Abassery, Amr Abd Elhady, Mohammed Saad Mekki, Hosni Helmy Asran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 19% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 69% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 18% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 7 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2017.
All research outputs
#16,721,387
of 24,590,593 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#2,040
of 2,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,831
of 159,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,590,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.