↓ Skip to main content

Wildfire impacts on the processes that generate debris flows in burned watersheds

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wildfire impacts on the processes that generate debris flows in burned watersheds
Published in
Natural Hazards, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9769-9
Authors

M. Parise, S. H. Cannon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 131 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Other 10 8%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 38 29%
Environmental Science 28 21%
Engineering 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 37 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2024.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#848
of 1,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,862
of 121,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.