↓ Skip to main content

Best practices for defining spatial boundaries and spatial structure in stock assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Fisheries Research, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Best practices for defining spatial boundaries and spatial structure in stock assessment
Published in
Fisheries Research, June 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2023.106650
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 41 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 24%
Environmental Science 11 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 45 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,228,066
of 27,791,073 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries Research
#855
of 3,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,909
of 404,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries Research
#11
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,791,073 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.