You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inter-Specific Coral Chimerism: Genetically Distinct Multicellular Structures Associated with Tissue Loss in Montipora capitata
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0022869 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thierry M. Work, Zac H. Forsman, Zoltán Szabó, Teresa D. Lewis, Greta S. Aeby, Robert J. Toonen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 62% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2017.
All research outputs
#14,282,319
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#117,149
of 195,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,751
of 119,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,335
of 2,279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.