You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RoboFinch: A versatile audio‐visual synchronised robotic bird model for laboratory and field research on songbirds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.14063 |
| Authors |
Ralph Simon, Judith Varkevisser, Ezequiel Mendoza, Klaus Hochradel, Rogier Elsinga, Peter G. Wiersma, Esmee Middelburg, Eva Zoeter, Constance Scharff, Katharina Riebel, Wouter Halfwerk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 8 | 5% |
| Japan | 7 | 5% |
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| South Africa | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Sri Lanka | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 67 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 83 | 56% |
| Scientists | 60 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2023.
All research outputs
#302,432
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#44
of 2,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,627
of 493,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#3
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.