↓ Skip to main content

Land subsidence caused by ground water withdrawal in urban areas

Overview of attention for article published in GeoJournal, October 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Land subsidence caused by ground water withdrawal in urban areas
Published in
GeoJournal, October 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00186338
Authors

Thomas L. Holzer, A. Ivan Johnson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 27%
Engineering 13 21%
Environmental Science 7 11%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,364,506
of 24,998,746 outputs
Outputs from GeoJournal
#236
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,786
of 10,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeoJournal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,998,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them