↓ Skip to main content

Resolving structural uncertainty in natural resources management using POMDP approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Modelling, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resolving structural uncertainty in natural resources management using POMDP approaches
Published in
Ecological Modelling, March 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.12.015
Authors

Byron K. Williams

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 9%
Australia 2 4%
Unknown 40 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 30%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 35%
Environmental Science 13 28%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 9%
Engineering 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Modelling
#773
of 2,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,228
of 120,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Modelling
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,342 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.