You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Failed magmatic eruptions: late-stage cessation of magma ascent
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Volcanology, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00445-010-0444-x |
| Authors |
Seth C. Moran, Chris Newhall, Diana C. Roman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 20% |
| Researcher | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 108 | 76% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,716,580
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#116
of 1,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,284
of 108,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them