↓ Skip to main content

Multiphase-flow numerical modeling of the 18 May 1980 lateral blast at Mount St. Helens, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Geology, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiphase-flow numerical modeling of the 18 May 1980 lateral blast at Mount St. Helens, USA
Published in
Geology, June 2011
DOI 10.1130/g31865.1
Authors

T. Esposti Ongaro, C. Widiwijayanti, A.B. Clarke, B. Voight, A. Neri

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 60%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Geology
#3,012
of 4,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,393
of 122,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geology
#23
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.