You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
3D volumetric modeling of grapevine biomass using Tripod LiDAR
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computers & Electronics in Agriculture, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.compag.2010.09.005 |
| Authors |
Keir E. Keightley, Gerald W. Bawden |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 25% |
| Researcher | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 28% |
| Engineering | 29 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Computers & Electronics in Agriculture
#546
of 1,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,645
of 113,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computers & Electronics in Agriculture
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,694 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.