You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Causes for the decline of suspended‐sediment discharge in the Mississippi River system, 1940–2007
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hydrological Processes, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/hyp.7477 |
| Authors |
Robert H. Meade, John A. Moody |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 20% |
| Researcher | 33 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 58 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 38 | 21% |
| Engineering | 22 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 45 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,287,258
of 24,851,605 outputs
Outputs from Hydrological Processes
#398
of 2,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,032
of 98,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrological Processes
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,851,605 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them