You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
「生類憐みの令」の動物観(上)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Japanese Journal of the History of Biology, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.24708/seibutsugakushi.99.0_11 |
| Authors |
溝口 元, 高山 晴子 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 20 | 19% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | <1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 106 | 99% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#555,319
of 25,884,216 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of the History of Biology
#1
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,196
of 463,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of the History of Biology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,884,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one scored the same or higher as 30 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them