You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Framework for Implementing Biodiversity Offsets: Selecting Sites and Determining Scale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1525/bio.2009.59.1.11 |
| Authors |
Joseph M. Kiesecker, Holly Copeland, Amy Pocewicz, Nate Nibbelink, Bruce McKenney, John Dahlke, Matt Holloran, Dan Stroud |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 278 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 95 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 57 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 12% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 115 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 110 | 35% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Unknown | 40 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,919,343
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#988
of 2,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,084
of 189,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.