You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multiple dendrochronological responses to the eruption of Cinder Cone, Lassen Volcanic National Park, California
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dendrochronologia, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.dendro.2009.09.001 |
| Authors |
Paul R. Sheppard, Michael H. Ort, Kirk C. Anderson, Michael A. Clynne, Elizabeth M. May |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 27% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,312,648
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Dendrochronologia
#125
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,211
of 183,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dendrochronologia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.