↓ Skip to main content

Micronutrient perspective on COVID-19: Umbrella review and reanalysis of meta-analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Micronutrient perspective on COVID-19: Umbrella review and reanalysis of meta-analyses
Published in
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, February 2023
DOI 10.1080/10408398.2023.2174948
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yafei Xie, Jianguo Xu, Dan Zhou, Mingyue Guo, Mengxiang Zhang, Ya Gao, Ming Liu, Jiyuan Shi, Kelu Yang, Qingyong Zheng, Liang Zhao, Yu Qin, Rui Hu, Jia Wei, Junhua Zhang, Jinhui Tian

Abstract

Micronutrients are clinically important in managing COVID-19, and numerous studies have been conducted, but inconsistent findings exist. To explore the association between micronutrients and COVID-19. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus for study search on July 30, 2022 and October 15, 2022. Literature selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed in a double-blinded, group discussion format. Meta-analysis with overlapping associations were reconsolidated using random effects models, and narrative evidence was performed in tabular presentations. 57 reviews and 57 latest original studies were included. 21 reviews and 53 original studies were of moderate to high quality. Vitamin D, vitamin B, zinc, selenium, and ferritin levels differed between patients and healthy people. Vitamin D and zinc deficiencies increased COVID-19 infection by 0.97-fold/0.39-fold and 1.53-fold. Vitamin D deficiency increased severity 0.86-fold, while low vitamin B and selenium levels reduced severity. Vitamin D and calcium deficiencies increased ICU admission by 1.09 and 4.09-fold. Vitamin D deficiency increased mechanical ventilation by 0.4-fold. Vitamin D, zinc, and calcium deficiencies increased COVID-19 mortality by 0.53-fold, 0.46-fold, and 5.99-fold, respectively. The associations between vitamin D, zinc, and calcium deficiencies and adverse evolution of COVID-19 were positive, while the association between vitamin C and COVID-19 was insignificant.REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022353953.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 20%
Librarian 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Unspecified 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 8 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,570,536
of 25,367,237 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
#574
of 2,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,191
of 499,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
#2
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,367,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.