You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rapid Changes in Small Fish Mercury Concentrations in Estuarine Wetlands: Implications for Wildlife Risk and Monitoring Programs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, October 2009
|
DOI | 10.1021/es901400c |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Collin A. Eagles-Smith, Joshua T. Ackerman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 31% |
Student > Master | 16 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 35% |
Environmental Science | 26 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,527,395
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#6,150
of 20,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,153
of 106,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#29
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.