You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Not all water becomes wine: Sulfur inputs as an opportune tracer of hydrochemical losses from vineyards
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Water Resources Research, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2007wr006672 |
| Authors |
Eve‐Lyn S. Hinckley, Carol Kendall, Keith Loague |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 18% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,460,035
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Research
#925
of 5,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,113
of 98,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Research
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.