↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying ecological, morphological, and genetic variation to delimit species in the coast horned lizard species complex (Phrynosoma)

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
563 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying ecological, morphological, and genetic variation to delimit species in the coast horned lizard species complex (Phrynosoma)
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2009
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0906380106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam D. Leaché, Michelle S. Koo, Carol L. Spencer, Theodore J. Papenfuss, Robert N. Fisher, Jimmy A. McGuire

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 563 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 3%
Brazil 12 2%
France 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Other 14 2%
Unknown 500 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 133 24%
Researcher 102 18%
Student > Master 82 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 45 8%
Student > Bachelor 37 7%
Other 126 22%
Unknown 38 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 433 77%
Environmental Science 31 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 <1%
Engineering 4 <1%
Other 15 3%
Unknown 53 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#67,495
of 104,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,122
of 127,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#474
of 733 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 733 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.