↓ Skip to main content

Inputs of Fossil Carbon from Wastewater Treatment Plants to U.S. Rivers and Oceans

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inputs of Fossil Carbon from Wastewater Treatment Plants to U.S. Rivers and Oceans
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, May 2009
DOI 10.1021/es9004043
Pubmed ID
Authors

David R. Griffith, Rebecca T. Barnes, Peter A. Raymond

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Israel 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 136 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 21%
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Master 20 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 38 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 26 18%
Engineering 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Chemical Engineering 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 47 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#8,966
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,873
of 125,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#69
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.