↓ Skip to main content

SSTL UK-DMC SLIM-6 Data Quality Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SSTL UK-DMC SLIM-6 Data Quality Assessment
Published in
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, March 2009
DOI 10.1109/tgrs.2009.2013206
Authors

Gyanesh Chander, Sebastien Saunier, Michael J. Choate, Pasquale L. Scaramuzza

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 38%
Student > Master 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
#790
of 3,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,958
of 107,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,045 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.