↓ Skip to main content

Pore-throat sizes in sandstones, tight sandstones, and shales

Overview of attention for article published in AAPG Bulletin, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
503 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pore-throat sizes in sandstones, tight sandstones, and shales
Published in
AAPG Bulletin, March 2009
DOI 10.1306/10240808059
Authors

Philip H. Nelson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 503 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 489 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 119 24%
Researcher 94 19%
Student > Master 72 14%
Other 31 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 61 12%
Unknown 100 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 185 37%
Engineering 108 21%
Energy 20 4%
Chemical Engineering 17 3%
Environmental Science 11 2%
Other 35 7%
Unknown 127 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from AAPG Bulletin
#69
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,548
of 108,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPG Bulletin
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.