You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Process Evaluation of the National Implementation of a Bundle for Central Venous Catheter Care for Hemodialysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Kidney360, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.34067/kid.0000000000000076 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison Craswell, Debbie Massey, Deepa Sriram, Marianne Wallis, Kevan Polkinghorne, Girish Talaulikar, Alan Cass, Martin Gallagher, Nicholas Gray, Sradha Kotwal, Senthil Kumar Balakrishnan, David Fernandes, Hemant Kulkarni, Casey Light, Jo Ryan, Emma Marsh, David Semple, Omar Tombocon, Rowan Walker, Scott Wilson, Vilma Lleva, Lucy Mwangi, Peter Mount, Maree Ross-Smith, Marieke Veenendaal, Vicki Smith, Christine Somerville, Shaun Davidson-West, Natalie Grainer, Stella Green, Murty Mantha, Kati Thiessen, Girish Talaulikar, Alison Winsbury, Irene Yao, Emily Neville, Pamela Lopez-Vargas, Khalilah Marquez, Mona Razavian, Lisa Tienstra, Glenn Stewart, Cathy Chan, Peta McLean, Lawrence McMahon, Matthew Roberts, Dong Wang, Monika Chang, Anna Chiam, Duncan Wright, Orla O'Brien, Ramyasuda Swaminathan, Samadhi Wimalasena, Harish Puttagunta, Jeffrey Barbara, Amanda Luke, Margaret Pummeroy, Kim Torpey, Gemma Nicholls, Amy Swinbank, Thomas Titus, Peter Choi, Ginger Chu, Leanne Garvey, Alastair Gillies, Shilpa Jesudason, Josephine Chow, Imelda De Guzman, Jeanny Gando, Jeffrey Wong, Richard Nguyen, Roy Cherian, Raye Gillard, Rachel James, Michael Burke, Leanne Glancy, Shimbie Lewis, Richard Baer, Sophie Wade, Kate Fitt, Peter Kerr, Kevan Polkinghorne, Mechelle Seneviratne, Muralikrishna Komala, Junie McCourt, Craig Lawlor, Julia Bell, David Johnson, Michaela Kelleher, Sradha Kotwal, Amanda Coburn, Sarah Guo, David Johnson, Joanna Sudak, Diana Leary, Jenny Anderson, Thin Han, Tresna Titmarsh, Emily Adam, Bronwyn Hockley, Jenny Latte, Yvonne Matthew, Stephen McDonald, Chen Au Peh, Rebecca Taylor, David McIntyre, Sharadchandra Ratanjee, Karolynn Maurice, Fiona Rettie, Madhivanan Sundaram, Naomi Grimshaw, Matthew Jose, Gail Read, Jayne Amy, Patricia Coutts, Maria Presno, Nigel Toussaint, Debbie Knagge, Colleen Van Senden, Linh Pham, Muh Geot Wong, Jane Nicholson, Paul Snelling, Neil Boudville, Alison Farmer, Ingrid Holmes, Victoria Link, Vivien Perreau, Nicole Warnecke, Sunil Badve, Yanella Martinez-Smith, Jayson Catiwa, Frank Ierino, Emmet O'flaherty, Nicholas Gray, Gerald Hilder, Kaylene Wadd, Andrea Pollock, Stanley Searle, Cheryl Wertheim, Stephen May, Jill Telfer, Martin Gallagher, Sradha Kotwal, Sarah Coggan, Casey Yates, Kathryn Higgins, Earl James, Alison Coenen, Kris Rogers, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Jayanthi Mysore, Joseph Alvin Santos, Benjamin Talbot, Katrina Thistlethwaite, Bruce Neal, Elizabeth Coroneos, Shannon Nugent, Ian Fox, Sree Venuthurupalli, Jennifer Connor, Ruth Thachaw, Sandra Crikis, Pauline Byrne, Karumathil Murali, Hicham Cheikh Hassan, Lin Huang, Romiereeza Dizon, Deepika Joshi, Jon Mendoza, Bishi Augustine, Disha Balraj, Vincent Lee, David O'Donnell |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 43% |
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 30% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,937,489
of 27,447,295 outputs
Outputs from Kidney360
#743
of 1,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,770
of 503,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kidney360
#53
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,447,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.