You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The national Fire and Fire Surrogate study: effects of fuel reduction methods on forest vegetation structure and fuels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1890/07-1747.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dylan W. Schwilk, Jon E. Keeley, Eric E. Knapp, James McIver, John D. Bailey, Christopher J. Fettig, Carl E. Fiedler, Richy J. Harrod, Jason J. Moghaddas, Kenneth W. Outcalt, Carl N. Skinner, Scott L. Stephens, Thomas A. Waldrop, Daniel A. Yaussy, Andrew Youngblood |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 5% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 229 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 57 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 18% |
| Unknown | 33 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 86 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 33% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2024.
All research outputs
#5,224,037
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,230
of 3,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,503
of 98,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.