↓ Skip to main content

Research in Thermal Biology: Burning Questions for Coldwater Stream Fishes

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fisheries Science, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Research in Thermal Biology: Burning Questions for Coldwater Stream Fishes
Published in
Reviews in Fisheries Science, February 2009
DOI 10.1080/10641260802590152
Authors

Dale A. McCullough, John M. Bartholow, Henriëtte I. Jager, Robert L. Beschta, Edward F. Cheslak, Michael L. Deas, Joseph L. Ebersole, J. Scott Foott, Sherri L. Johnson, Keith R. Marine, Matthew G. Mesa, James H. Petersen, Yves Souchon, Kenneth F. Tiffan, Wayne A. Wurtsbaugh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 230 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 16%
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 17 7%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 28 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 86 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 7%
Engineering 4 2%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 38 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,797,908
of 23,680,154 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fisheries Science
#119
of 213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,890
of 174,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fisheries Science
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,680,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.