↓ Skip to main content

Past SARS-CoV-2 infection protection against re-infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 42,993)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Past SARS-CoV-2 infection protection against re-infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
The Lancet, February 2023
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02465-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

COVID-19 Forecasting Team, Caroline Stein, Hasan Nassereldine, Reed J D Sorensen, Joanne O Amlag, Catherine Bisignano, Sam Byrne, Emma Castro, Kaleb Coberly, James K Collins, Jeremy Dalos, Farah Daoud, Amanda Deen, Emmanuela Gakidou, John R Giles, Erin N Hulland, Bethany M Huntley, Kasey E Kinzel, Rafael Lozano, Ali H Mokdad, Tom Pham, David M Pigott, Robert C Reiner, Theo Vos, Simon I Hay, Christopher J L Murray, Stephen S Lim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12,404 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 16%
Other 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Student > Master 7 3%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 86 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Unspecified 7 3%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 95 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10831. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#147
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#16
of 42,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4
of 427,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#1
of 319 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 319 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.