You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hydrological response to timber harvest in northern Idaho: implications for channel scour and persistence of salmonids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hydrological Processes, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/hyp.6918 |
| Authors |
Daniele Tonina, Charles H. Luce, Bruce Rieman, John M. Buffington, Peter Goodwin, Stephen R. Clayton, Shawkat Md. Alì, Jeffrey J. Barry, Charles Berenbrock |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 19% |
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Professor | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 19 | 33% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 16% |
| Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,224,240
of 24,640,106 outputs
Outputs from Hydrological Processes
#742
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,270
of 83,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrological Processes
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,640,106 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.