You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Biodynamic Understanding of Dietborne Metal Uptake by a Freshwater Invertebrate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1021/es7022913 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie-Noële Croteau, Samuel N. Luoma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 39% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 22 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2009.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#9,522
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,812
of 172,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#66
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.