You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
植生管理に向けた新たな河川工作物の提案とその効果に関する実証研究
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research), June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2208/jscejer.71.iii_221 |
| Authors |
山西 博幸, 木塚 綾, 大峯 貴裕, 高致晟, 長濱 祐美 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 9 | 29% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,874,168
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research)
#3
of 54 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,556
of 355,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them