You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recent climate trends and implications for water resources in the Catskill Mountain region, New York, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Hydrology, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.12.019 |
| Authors |
Douglas A. Burns, Julian Klaus, Michael R. McHale |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 23% |
| Researcher | 28 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 28 | 22% |
| Engineering | 17 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hydrology
#728
of 8,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,589
of 90,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hydrology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,696 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.