↓ Skip to main content

Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2023
DOI 10.1007/s00464-023-09911-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin-On Jung, Eline M. de Groot, B. Feike Kingma, Benjamin Babic, Jelle P. Ruurda, Peter P. Grimminger, Jens P. Hölzen, Yin-Kai Chao, Jan W. Haveman, Marc J. van Det, Philippe Rouanet, Frank Benedix, Hecheng Li, Inderpal Sarkaria, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Gijs I. van Boxel, Philip Chiu, Jan-Hendrik Egberts, Rubens Sallum, Arul Immanuel, Paul Turner, Donald E. Low, Michal Hubka, Daniel Perez, Paolo Strignano, Matthias Biebl, M. Asif Chaudry, Christiane J. Bruns, Richard van Hillegersberg, Hans F. Fuchs

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Researcher 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 50%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,271,447
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#387
of 6,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,888
of 428,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#1
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.