↓ Skip to main content

Stress orientations of Taiwan Chelungpu‐Fault Drilling Project (TCDP) hole‐A as observed from geophysical logs

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stress orientations of Taiwan Chelungpu‐Fault Drilling Project (TCDP) hole‐A as observed from geophysical logs
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, January 2007
DOI 10.1029/2006gl028050
Authors

Hung‐Yu Wu, Kuo‐Fong Ma, Mark Zoback, Naomi Boness, Hisao Ito, Jih‐Hao Hung, Stephen Hickman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 29%
Researcher 8 18%
Professor 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 60%
Engineering 3 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,112,127
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#9,142
of 20,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,448
of 169,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#53
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.