↓ Skip to main content

Magnesium and calcium sulfate stabilities and the water budget of Mars

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnesium and calcium sulfate stabilities and the water budget of Mars
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, November 2007
DOI 10.1029/2007je002898
Authors

I‐Ming Chou, Robert R. Seal

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Professor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 46%
Physics and Astronomy 7 11%
Chemistry 6 10%
Unspecified 3 5%
Materials Science 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#4,077
of 12,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,386
of 90,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#49
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.